Canadian integrated program for antimicrobial resistance surveillance (CIPARS): Key and integrated findings

CIPARS collects, analyses, and communicates trends in antimicrobial use and in antimicrobial resistance for select bacteria from humans, animals, and retail meat across Canada.

  • Last updated: 2026-10-09

This page provides a summary of CIPARS key and integrated findings. The page highlights important AMR and AMU trends across host species, bacterial species, antimicrobials, and surveillance components.

The interactive visualizations are updated regularly and therefore may differ from published CIPARS reports.

On this page

  • Key Findings
  • 3rd gen cephalosporin resistance & use
  • ESBL-producing Salmonella
  • Nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella Enteritidis
  • Ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter

Key Findings

Year


Veterinary Antimicrobial Sales:

Between 2020 and 2024, the relative quantity of medically important antimicrobials (MIAs) sold for use in animals decreased by approximately 13% (mg/kg biomass). This included a 5% relative decrease in mg/kg biomass between 2023 and 2024. However, Category IFootnote i sales (very high importance in human medicine) increased by a relative 23% over the same 2020–2024 period after adjusting for animal biomass. Sales for use in aquaculture increased by 226% relative to 2020, however, the increase in 2024 was unusual and anecdotal information indicates this may be due to a disease outbreak driving this increase.

Canada's ranking changed from 4th highest (in 2022) to 5th highest (in 2023) for antimicrobial sales for use in animals when compared to European countriesFootnote ii. Canadian sales of MIAs for animals were slightly higher than the average for the Americas, according to global data in the World Organisation for Animal Health’s ANIMUSEFootnote iii (based on 2022 data).

Sentinel Farm Antimicrobial Use (AMU):

From volunteer broiler chicken sentinel farm surveillance, there was a 10% relative increase in reported AMU between 2020 and 2024. However, in broiler chickens since 2022, there was a relative decrease of 8% in reported AMU along with shifts in the categories of MIA reported (16% relative increase in Category III). For turkeys, though there was a 4% relative decrease in reported AMU since 2020, AMU has increased 233%Footnote iv since 2022 (increased in all categories). In 2024, for turkeys there was no reported Category I use. For layer chickens on farm, only Category III antimicrobials were reported. For grower-finisher pigs although there was a 21% relative decrease in reported AMU between 2020 and 2024, there was a relative increase of 15% between 2023 and 2024 (measured in nDDDvetCA/1000 animal-days at risk). Additionally, there was a substantial relative increase in Category I use between 2020 and 2024 (though Category I represent less than 1% total reported AMU). For feedlot cattle, reported AMU decreased by 6% relative to 2020 and reported Category I use (less than 1% of total use) also decreased.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR):

We are seeing increases in concerning resistances across sectors:

  • CIPARS continued to detect increasing proportions of nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella Enteritidis from healthy chickens at abattoir, chicken meat, and humans. This increase appeared to be attributed to the emergence of a mutation (D87Y) in the gyrase A gene (gyrA)Footnote v.
  • Ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter from feedlot cattle, dairy cattle, and healthy cattle at abattoir continued to rise. This trend was variable in other species/stages of the food chain. Overall, ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter from humans remained high (35% in 2024) with a variable trend.
  • Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella from humans, and animals/food continued to increase. The frequency of ESBL-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella in 2017 was less than 0.5% for each of humans and animals/food, in 2024 this stands at 1.9% and 2.7%, respectively.

In contrast, there are some resistance patterns of public health concern that we are either not seeing or rarely detecting:

  • Mobile colistin resistance and carbapenemase-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella were rarely detected.
    • Mobile colistin resistance was detected in two human non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates and one retail salmon Aeromonas isolate from Canada in 2024.
    • Carbapenemase-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella have not been found from either human or animal sources since 2018.

Additionally, there are other detections or trends in AMR in individual sectors that we have been following such as:

  • In broiler chickens (abattoir), there was an increase in ciprofloxacin resistance in E. coli and Salmonella between 2020 and 2024. There was an increase in ciprofloxacin resistance in Salmonella in retail chicken between 2020 and 2024.
  • In retail seafood, resistance to colistin (in an Aeromonas isolate from a salmon sample) was found (see above) and additionally resistance to ciprofloxacin (in an E. coli isolate from a scallop) was found in 2024.
  • While infrequent, non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates with Category I resistance, which were also multidrug-resistant, were found in the environment of sick animals between 2020 and 2024.
  • In untreated/raw water samples, 10 E. coli isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin were found in 2024.
  • In humans, the frequency of ciprofloxacin resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella increased 15% between 2020 and 2024 (33% in 2024).

New Surveillance Component:

One of the new reporting items for CIPARS for 2024 was information on antifungal sales from Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Agency. The total quantity of triazoles sold as pesticides was greater than the total quantity of medically important antibiotics sold for use in humans, animals, and plants/crops combined. None of the antifungal active ingredients sold for use on plants/crops are approved for veterinary or human use (although there are other triazoles approved for use in humans and animals).

Footnotes

Between 2019 and 2023, we observed a plateau in the quantity of medically important antimicrobials sold for use in animals. Meanwhile, the median quantity of antimicrobials sold for use in production animals continued to decrease annually across 31 European network countries. As a result, our ranking of antimicrobial sales, compared to Europe, is worsening. From our volunteer sentinel farm surveillance, between 2019 and 2023, we observed a decreasing trend in antimicrobial use (AMU) on broiler chicken, turkey, and grower-finisher pig farms and on beef cattle feedlots. For sentinel dairy cattle farms, AMU increased between 2019 and 2022, which may be partially attributed to improved reporting in 2021 and 2022. Data from Fisheries and Oceans Canada showed a decrease in AMU for aquaculture operations between 2019 and 2022, with an increase between 2021 and 2022. Less than 2% of reported AMU (defined daily doses per 1,000 animal-days at risk) on sentinel terrestrial farms were Category I antimicrobials (considered of very high importance in human medicine).

At the same time, we are seeing increases in concerning resistances. There are increases in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella across humans, animals and food. There are increases in the percentage of ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter in animals and food, along with increases in the quantity of fluoroquinolones sold for use in animals. For people, the trend in percentages of ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter was variable, however, the overall percentage was high (≥30%) or very high (≥60%) depending on the Campylobacter species and year. At the same time, the quantity of fluoroquinolones used in people has decreased. With respect to mobile colistin resistance (mcr), in 2023, we detected mcr genes in a human Salmonella isolate and an Aeromonas isolate from imported shrimp. Nalidixic acid resistance in Salmonella Enteritidis from poultry continued to increase, as well as gentamicin resistance in Campylobacter from feedlot cattle. The quantity of third generation cephalosporins sold for use in animals increased, however, ceftriaxone resistance in E. coli and non-typhoidal Salmonella from animals and food remained stable. For feedlot cattle, the frequency of streptogramin resistance in Enterococcus increased, mirrored by an increase in the reported use of streptogramins in-feed.

As CIPARS continues to work towards embracing a One Health approach, we have new information on AMR in select bacteria from water, farm environments, feed ingredients and mixed feed intended for animals and additional retail commodities. Resistance to Category I antimicrobials was found in isolates from both surface water and the environment of sick animals. Resistant non-typhoidal Salmonella from serovars that can cause disease in Canadians were found in feed ingredients and mixed feeds intended for animals. CIPARS has also partnered with AMRNet-Vet to look at AMR in animal pathogens from samples sent to veterinary diagnostic laboratories, starting with pathogens causing bovine respiratory disease. This complements our work with surveillance of healthy feedlot cattle for the same respiratory pathogens. Over the past five years, we have found that there is less resistance when cattle arrive at the feedlot, yet during the same time, resistance at the time of cattle re-handling has increased (including multidrug resistance).

Other advancements in surveillance activities include antimicrobial sales data by province/region using a biomass denominator and the inclusion of data on dispensing of antimicrobials from community pharmacies for use in companion animals, which includes small amounts of carbapenems.

3rd gen cephalosporin resistance & use

Ceftriaxone-resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella, S. Heidelberg, and E. coli from chicken(s) and/or people, and third generation cephalosporin use/sales.

Importance:

Third generation cephalosporins are considered of very high importance to human medicineFootnote 1 in Canada and around the worldFootnote 2. While salmonellosis is often not treated in people, if treatment is needed, third generation cephalosporins are one of the only treatment options for children and pregnant womenFootnote 3. Heidelberg is a serovar of Salmonella (i.e., a strain of Salmonella) that tends to make people very sickFootnote 3Footnote 4.

Data to action:

Historically, in Canada, Salmonella Heidelberg was one of the most commonly reported third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Salmonella serovars recovered from poultry and peopleFootnote 5. A third-generation cephalosporin (ceftiofur) was used in chickens to prevent E. coli omphalitisFootnote 5.

Following a voluntary withdrawal of ceftiofur for use in disease prevention by the poultry industry in 2005 and then again in 2014, there was a reduction in the frequency of ceftriaxone resistance in Salmonella from broiler chickens (both healthy chickens on farm and at abattoir (i.e., at slaughter), sick chickens (clinical cases)) and in chicken purchased at the grocery store (Figure 1). Importantly, there was also a reduction in ceftriaxone-resistant S. Heidelberg in people (Figure 1).

In chicken(s), this trend was also observed in E. coli (Figure 1) adding further evidence to a common selective pressure for the resistant determinant. Ceftriaxone-resistant S. Heidelberg has not been found in healthy broiler chicken on farm since 2018. From 2003 to 2019, S. Heidelberg was a top 3 serovar from humans composing 6 to 21% of human Salmonella isolates. However, in 2023 in humans, S. Heidelberg contributed to less than 1% of isolates and was not in the top 10 serovars.

2024 data updates

The conclusions of the story remain the same. The recovery of Salmonella Heidelberg continues to decrease across host species. Ceftriaxone resistance in S. Heidelberg continues to exist at low-levels in humans (4.8% in 2024) and there remains no ceftriaxone resistance in S. Heidelberg from broiler chickens (both healthy chickens on farm and at abattoir), diagnostic clinical submissions from chickens, or in retail chicken. The frequency of ceftriaxone resistance remained low (<6%) in E. coli isolates from samples from broiler chickens (both healthy chickens on farm and at abattoir) and retail chicken.

Ceftiofur was not reported to be used in hatcheries supplying broiler chicken farms participating in CIPARS sentinel farm surveillance. Whereas, ceftriaxone use in humans has continued to rise in both the hospital (hospital purchases) and community settings (dispensations from community pharmacies)Footnote i.

Footnotes
References

Figure 1. CIPARS-FNC: Frequency of ceftriaxone resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from chicken(s) and/or people, and ceftiofur use in broiler chicken flocks.

Hover over the line or bar graph to see more details. Click on a legend element to add or remove the corresponding lines from the graph. Red text in the hover over field highlights a small total isolate count (less than 20).

Figure 1: Important data details (details change based on filter selections)
  • For low isolate counts (red text in the hover over field), interpret proportions with caution.
  • The farm data presented are unadjusted for clustering of multiple isolates from the same farm.
  • Breakpoints used for interpretation of the minimum inhibitory concentrations from antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates are available in summary tables.
  • The persistence of highly pathogenic avian influenza impacted the number of sentinel flocks available for farm sampling since 2020 for broiler chickens.
  • Retail chicken isolates were obtained from samples of breasts and parts (e.g., thighs, drumsticks, wings) until 2022, after which only breast samples were collected. Samples were collected for the CIPARS and FNC programs.
  • Results for broiler chickens at the farm-level were based on pooled fecal samples collected from healthy birds.
  • Results shown for abattoir were obtained from cecal samples collected from healthy birds.
  • Results shown for clinical cases are from samples that may have been collected from sick animals or non-diseased animals from the same flock. These diagnostic samples are largely from layer pullets/hens or broiler chickens but may also have been from primary layer breeders or broiler breeder birds.
  • Please note the change in the y-axis scale as different data series are included/excluded.
Figure 1: Text description

Table 1 (a). CIPARS-FNC: Frequency of ceftriaxone resistance in [Bacteria and subtype] isolates in Canada.

The asterisk (*) highlights a small total isolate count (less than 20).

Table 1 (b). CIPARS-FNC: Frequency of ceftiofur use in broiler chicken flocks in Canada.

ESBL-producing Salmonella

Increasing frequency of ESBL-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella from humans, animals and food

Importance:

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Salmonella are resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. Salmonella are part of the Enterobacterales order. ESBL-producing Enterobacterales are in the ‘Tier 1: High-priority’ group of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens of concern in CanadaFootnote 1 and a critical group according to the World Health Organization’s Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024Footnote 2.

What the data are telling us:

ESBL-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) from humans and animal/food sources continues to steadily increase (Figure 1). Of all the Salmonella tested, the frequency of ESBL-producing Salmonella in 2017 was 0.5% for humans (n = 27 ESBL isolates/5010 total NTS isolates) and 0.3% for animals and food (n = 6/2372). Whereas in 2023, the frequencies rose to 1.6% (n = 91/5843) and 1.6% (n = 36/2208), respectively (Figure 1).

In humans, of all ESBLs, the predominant ESBL gene (blaCTX-M-65) decreased from 66% in 2019 to 42% in 2023 and the majority were found in S. Infantis (n = 33). Whereas the second most predominant ESBL gene, blaCTX-M-55, increased from 13% in 2019 to 37% in 2023. The majority of these blaCTX-M-55 carrying isolates were Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- (n = 22).

In animals/food, of all ESBL carrying isolates, the predominant ESBL gene was blaCTX-M-65, which increased from 24% in 2018, to 59% in 2022 to 80% in 2023. In 2023, the majority of these blaCTX-M-65 carrying isolates were S. Infantis (n = 21).

2024 data updates

ESBL-producing NTS isolates recovered from humans and animals/food continued to increase, with a sharp increase in animals/food between 2023 and 2024. Of all the NTS tested, the frequency of ESBL-producing NTS was 1.9% and 2.7% from humans and animals/food, respectively in 2024. CTX-M-65 increased in both animal/food sources and humans. Salmonella Infantis was the most common serovar with this gene, 95% and 92% of CTX-M-65 from humans and animals/food, respectively from 2017 and 2024. In humans, the frequency of CTX-M-55 increased since 2017, while in animals/food, the frequency of this gene of all NTS tested was variable ranging from 0.1% to 0.4% across years. Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i:- was the most common serovar with this gene, 60% and 37% of CTX-M-55 from humans and animals/food, respectively from 2017 and 2024.

References

Figure 1. CIPARS-FNC: Frequency of ESBL-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella from humans, animals and food.

Hover over the line or bar graph to see more details. Click on a legend element to add or remove the corresponding lines from the graph.

Figure 1: Important data details
  • This visualization only includes data on non-typhoidal Salmonella (including S. Paratyphi B var. Java)
  • The results were based on genotypic testing. Details of PHAC’s Staramr program, which was used for prediction of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) from whole genome sequencing data, are available in the interpretive criteria tab.
  • The lines in the figure are dashed as the information is derived from genotypic testing.
  • Revisions to the denominators (total NTS tested) for animal/food sources resulted in slight adjustments to the previously reported frequencies of ESBL-producing NTS.
Figure 1: Text description

Table 1. CIPARS-FNC: Frequency of ESBL-producing non-typhoidal Salmonella from humans, animals and food.

Nalidixic acid-resistant Salmonella Enteritidis

Nalidixic acid resistance in Salmonella Enteritidis from chicken(s)

Importance:

Salmonella Enteritidis isolates from chickens and chicken meat were historically almost 100% susceptible to all the antimicrobials that CIPARS tested. However, in 2018 CIPARS reported the emergence of nalidixic acid-resistant S. Enteritidis from chicken(s). Nalidixic acid is a quinolone and resistance to quinolones can often be a precursor to resistance to fluoroquinolones. These isolates with nalidixic acid resistance also had reduced susceptibility to fluoroquinolones. Fluoroquinolones are considered of very high importance to human medicineFootnote 1 in Canada and around the worldFootnote 2.

Salmonella Enteritidis is one of the top serovars that we find in people with salmonellosis and one of the top serovars we see in chicken(s).

What the data are telling us:

In 2018, nalidixic acid resistance in S. Enteritidis was first detected in CIPARS isolates (n = 5 isolates) from healthy chickens at slaughter, sick chickens (clinical cases) and chicken meat (Figure 1). These proportions were mostly stable until 2022 when CIPARS observed a substantial spike in resistance across farm, abattoir, retail, and diagnostic chicken isolates (Figure 1). In 2023, nalidixic acid resistance was found in the following components/sources: chicken meat (n = 21 resistant isolates/70 total S. Enteritidis isolates), diagnostic samples from sick chickens (n = 31/78), healthy chicken at slaughter (n = 6/31) and healthy broiler chickens on farm (n = 10/29) (Figure 1).

This spike in resistance appears to be driven by a GyrA (D87Y) substitution. Further genomic analyses are on-going, including looking at the genes in the human S. Enteritidis isolates.

2024 data updates

Nalidixic acid resistance in S. Enteritidis continues to increase in isolates from healthy chickens at abattoir and retail chicken. There were also substantial increases in nalidixic acid resistance in human S. Enteritidis isolates, with resistance approaching a frequency of 60% in 2024.

Since 2018, all nalidixic acid-resistant S. Enteritidis isolates from broiler chickens (farm, abattoir and clinical cases) and retail, were sequence type 11 and had a mutation (D87Y) in the gyrA gene. The mutation in the gyrase A gene results in an amino acid change (D87Y) in the gyrase A protein (which is the target of fluoroquinolones). In humans, S. Enteritidis isolates with this mutation in gyrA (D87Y) substantially increased as well, with 99.4% of these isolates also being of sequence type 11.

Complicating the situation, in humans, we are also seeing this mutation in S. Infantis, rising from 11% of Infantis isolates in 2017 to 42% in 2024.

References

Figure 1. CIPARS-FNC: Frequency of nalidixic acid resistance in Salmonella Enteritidis from chicken(s)

Hover over the line graph to see more details. Click on a legend element to add or remove the corresponding lines from the graph. Red text in the hover over field highlights a small total isolate count (less than 20).

Figure 1: Important data details
  • For low isolate counts (red text in the hover over field), interpret proportions with caution.
  • The farm data presented are unadjusted for clustering of multiple isolates from the same farm.
  • Breakpoints used for interpretation of the minimum inhibitory concentrations from antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates are available in summary tables.
  • The persistence of highly pathogenic avian influenza impacted the number of sentinel flocks available for farm sampling since 2020 for broiler chickens.
  • Retail chicken isolates were obtained from samples of breasts and parts (e.g., thighs, drumsticks, wings) until 2022, after which only breast samples were collected. Samples were collected for the CIPARS and FNC programs.
  • Results for broiler chickens at the farm-level were based on pooled fecal samples collected from healthy birds.
  • Results shown for slaughter were obtained from cecal samples collected from healthy birds.
  • Results shown for clinical cases are from samples that may have been collected from sick animals or non-diseased animals from the same flock. These diagnostic samples are largely from layer hens or broiler chickens but may also have been from primary layer breeders or broiler breeder birds.
  • Human results were based on predicted phenotypes from genotypic testing starting in 2018, prior to 2018 they were based on phenotypic testing. Details of PHAC’s Staramr program, which was used for prediction of AMR from whole genome sequencing data, are available in the interpretive criteria tab.
  • Please note the change in the y-axis scale as different data series are included/excluded.
Figure 1: Text description

Table 1. CIPARS-FNC: Frequency of nalidixic acid resistance in Salmonella Enteritidis from chicken(s)

The asterisk (*) highlights a small total isolate count (less than 20).

Ciprofloxacin-resistant Campylobacter

Ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter and fluoroquinolones sold for use in animals and people.

Importance:

CIPARS has been watching an increasing trend in ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter across multiple animal species and at different stages along the food chain. Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone. Fluoroquinolones are considered of very high importance to human medicineFootnote 1 in Canada and around the worldFootnote 2.

What the data are telling us:

Between 2022 and 2023, an increase in ciprofloxacin resistance was observed in Campylobacter recovered from all terrestrial food animal species under surveillance at the farm-level (broiler chickens, layer chickensdFootnote i, turkeys, pigs, dairy cattle and feedlot cattle). Across the food animal species (farm-level), the magnitude of the increase (percentage difference) during this time frame was between 2% and 20%, with high frequencies of ciprofloxacin resistance in 2023 ranging between 19% and 46%. Further genomic analyses are on-going to understand this trend across multiple host species.

The human Campylobacter data are from clinical cases reported within FoodNet Canada. Overall, ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter from humans has remained stable, based on data available up to 2022. In C. jejuni, resistance levels were high in 2018 and 2022 (32% and 30%, respectively), although there was a decreasing trend between 2019 (45%) to 2022 (30%). In C. colidFootnote ii, ciprofloxacin resistance was 70% in 2018 and 60% in 2022, but there was an increasing trend between 2020 (33%) and 2022 (60%).

In 2023, more fluoroquinolones were sold (or intended for use) in humansdFootnote iii than animals (human range: 4.16 to 5.60 mg/kg biomass vs. animal range: 0.04 to 0.11 mg/kg biomass). Between 2019 and 2023, the quantity of fluoroquinolones intended for use in humans decreased by 26% (5.60 to 4.16 mg/kg biomass). Whereas in animals, the quantity of fluoroquinolones sold by manufacturers and importers, while small relative to other antimicrobial classes, increased by 38% (0.08 to 0.11 mg/kg biomassdFootnote iv).

2024 data updates

Ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacter from feedlot cattle, dairy cattle, and healthy cattle at abattoir continued to rise. The increase in feedlot cattle was significant and substantial between 2023 and 2024, with the frequency of resistance approaching 60% in 2024.

The story seems to be changing in the other species at different stages of the food chain, where fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter is becoming more variable or even decreasing in broiler chickens on farmFootnote v and in retail turkey. For humans, the trend has been variable with high frequencies of resistance ranging between 25-44% across the years and resistance of 35% in 2024.

In 2024, more fluoroquinolones were sold (or intended for use) in humansFootnote iii than animalsFootnote 3 (humans: 3.97 mg/population-adjusted biomass vs. animals: 0.16 mg/kg biomass). Between 2020 and 2024, the quantity of fluoroquinolones intended for use in humans decreased by 14% (4.63 to 3.97 mg/population-adjusted biomass).

In animals, the quantity of fluoroquinolones sold by manufacturers and importers, while small relative to other antimicrobial classes, increased by 220% (0.05 to 0.16 mg/kg biomass)Footnote iv.

Footnotes
References

Figure 1. CIPARS-FNC: Frequency of ciprofloxacin-resistance in Campylobacter from humans, animals and food

Hover over the line graph to see more details. Click on a legend element to add or remove the corresponding lines from the graph. Red text in the hover over field highlights a small total isolate count (less than 20).

Figure 1: Important data details (details change based on filter selections)
  • For low isolate counts (red text in the hover over field), interpret proportions with caution.
  • Breakpoints used for interpretation of the minimum inhibitory concentrations from antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates are available in summary tables.
  • Please note the change in the y-axis scale as different data series are included/excluded.
Figure 1: Text description

Table 1. CIPARS-FNC: Frequency of ciprofloxacin-resistance in [bacteria] from [survComp]

The asterisk (*) highlights a small total isolate count (less than 20).

Additional information

Please contact CIPARS with any questions about our data or if you require additional data. For more information, please visit the Public Health Agency of Canada’s (PHAC) Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS), Veterinary antimicrobial sales reporting, PHAC’s FoodNet Canada (FNC) and FNC’s interactive data visualizations.

Acknowledgments

PHAC acknowledges the significant efforts by all CIPARS collaborators who help to make this program a continued success.

Suggested citation

Public Health Agency of Canada. (YYYY (last updated)) CIPARS: Key and Integrated Findings. Government of Canada. Available from: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/cipars/integrated-findings.html. Accessed MM/DD/YYYY.


Did you find what you were looking for?

What was wrong?

(Don’t include any personal information. Note that you will not receive a reply.)
Maximum 300 characters

Thank you for your feedback

Date modified: